Shoryl and I are going to see Prince Caspian tonight. In digging around for information on the movie*, I came across a "correction" of an Associated Press article. I'm paraphrasing here, but basically it said that the AP had incorrectly identified Prince Caspian as the second book in the Chronicles of Narnia. It was the second book published, but once more were written, became the fourth one chronologically.
This has been bugging me for a long, long time. I have a very rigid belief about how one reads series. As a fantasy reader, you almost have to have at least something of a method of approach, since the chances that you're reading a stand-alone fantasy are vanishingly slim. Usually, we series readers putter along happily, devouring one book after another. When you're reading an author that's current, you snatch them up as they're published. Or, if you're reading a series that hinges upon knowing what came before, you read them in the order the author tells you to - also generally as they're published.
But what if you're reading a series made up of self-contained stories in a shared universe? What order do you read them in? Mercedes Lackey, for instance, bounces back and forth in time with her Valdemar series. Terry Pratchett - while he generally moves linearly through time - writes wholly "finish this book and the main plot is resolved" completed works with Discworld.
And CS Lewis wrote Chronicles of Narnia. While they share both a universe and a timeline, I'm up-in-arms about how they should be read. Fantastic Fiction gives me the following reading order:
1. The Magician's Nephew (1955)
2. The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (1950)
3. The Horse and his Boy (1954)
4. Prince Caspian (1951)
5. The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (1952)
6. The Silver Chair (1953)
7. The Last Battle (1956)
2. The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (1950)
3. The Horse and his Boy (1954)
4. Prince Caspian (1951)
5. The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (1952)
6. The Silver Chair (1953)
7. The Last Battle (1956)
Hold it. Stop, stop, STOP!
I had a gorgeous boxed set of the Narnia books when I was young. They're long gone now, probably in the great storage area debacle of which we will not speak. And I'm really regretting that now. Because the books in my set looked like this:
1. The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
2. Prince Caspian
3. The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
4. The Silver Chair
5. The Horse and His Boy
6. The Magician's Nephew
7. The Last Battle
Publication order. That's the way I read them, loved them. Did you know you literally can't buy a set numbered like that anymore? Trust me, I've looked.
This is the way I read any series: Valdemar, Discworld, Narnia. As a writer myself, I know that the author doesn't know the whole story when they put pen to paper for the first book. Oh, maybe they know the big points, but the particulars? Nah. The story was (generally) written as it was published, and that's how they're supposed to be read. Further, reading them in chronological order may reveal things to you that you just don't want to know. Reading The Magician's Nephew before The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe takes all the wonder out of Lucy's discovery of the wardrobe, and takes away the whole mystery of Narnia itself. The Horse and His Boy is only tragic in the beginning if you've read enough of the stories to know how things are supposed to work.
And reading the Storm Winds trilogy before you read the Herald-Mage trilogy would cause you to not understand precisely why there aren't Herald-Mages anymore. You see? You just can't mess with an author's intentions like that. You won't have the enjoyment of the stories as the author wanted to present them to you.
So tonight I'm going to go watch the movie Disney made of the second Narnia book. And hopefully, they'll also adapt the third book in the series: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader.
*Shoryl calls me an information junkie. It's likely true, but I'd need to find out more to be sure ...

